Are you confused by all of the Outlook choices available? You’re not by yourself. A list of additional variations that may be used to accomplish the same goal was presented by Microsoft veteran Scott Hanselman.
This issue affects a number of Microsoft products. Which application should be used to open a file? Is Outlook (New) or Outlook New the better option? Sticking his tongue out, Hanselman added a few additional choices: Outlook (Caffeine Free), Outlook (Zero Sugar), and so on.
Although we believe that the version of Outlook in Office 97 was the pinnacle, Hanselman, the Developer Community veep at Microsoft, also listed Outlook ’95. A period when security wasn’t as necessary and people were happier and more trusting.
Although users may establish several Outlook profiles to save information about their email accounts and data locations, Hanselman’s piece on Bluesky draws attention to a problem that many Microsoft software customers face: choose which version of the program to use.
Users of Teams frequently see a range of programs; for instance, Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Teams (Personal) frequently show up side by side in the system tray.
Users probably have more than one version of Outlook installed. In order for the two to coexist, Microsoft rebranded the old version of Outlook as Outlook (Classic) and installed the new version on devices as part of a Windows update. Microsoft wants customers to switch to the new version of Outlook even if it lacks many of the features of its predecessor, even though support for the Classic version will continue until at least 2029.
Microsoft states that “The new Outlook for Windows, built upon modern service architecture, is inspired by the Outlook web experience.” Additionally, it is incompatible with the COM add-ins that many businesses employ to integrate corporate workflows.
The new Outlook is currently in the opt-in phase and is turned off by default. After then, users will have to deliberately switch back to the Classic experience prior to the Cutover stage, after which there is no way to go back. Before this is put into production rings, Microsoft promises to give admins at least a year’s notice.
According to Microsoft, permanent installations of older versions of Outlook “will continue to be supported until at least 2029,”
It’s worth noting what happened when a soft drink firm attempted to replace a popular product with a “new” one and labeled the previously favored version as “classic.”
The humorous list that Hanselman, who is also well-known for his advice on using Microsoft’s personal information manager, presented also emphasises the dangers of having several alternatives that do the same task and the possibility of confounding customers.
Writer and blogger Richard Speed wrote this piece and discussed in a forum with TheRegister how Outlook users feel about the various outlooks and the ambiguity around them.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
Although users may establish several Outlook profiles to save information about their email accounts and data locations, Hanselman’s piece on Bluesky draws attention to a problem that many Microsoft software customers face: choose which version of the program to use.
