On Wednesday, a South Korean parliamentary committee passed a vote which recommended the amendment of law regarding the in-app commission charged by companies like Google and Apple. The parliament is advocating that the percentage that is being charged from developers for in-app purchases by Google and Apple should be put a stop to.
In the recent past and even before then, Google and Apple have been faced with huge criticisms concerning the commission that they charge developers when users make in-app purchases using apps that were developed by these developers. Users typically access these apps via the app stores provided by Google and Apple and developers are made to remit 30 percent of whatever they get from in-app purchases to Apple and Google.
Android users who want to buy and download apps majorly use Google’s PlayStore. Google has made it such that users are left with no choice but to make all their app purchases and downloads through its PlayStore app, giving it some kind of monopoly. The company has been severally accused of not allowing other app stores the opportunity to thrive. Their Apple counterparts, on the other hand, make all their app purchases and downloads via Apple’s App Store. Now, what this automatically means is that these companies have an unspoken monopoly and can choose to come up with terms and conditions whether they are friendly to developers or not, and the 30 percent in-app purchases commission is one of those decisions that has been completely frowned at.
Apple has come up to speak about the bill. A Tuesday statement by the tech giant said that the bill would “put users who purchase digital goods from other sources at risk of fraud, undermine their privacy protections” and make them susceptible to several attacks that its supposed “monopoly” has been protecting users from.
Google also had something to say about the bill. Wilson White – Senior Director of Public Policy at Google said that “the rushed process hasn’t allowed for enough analysis of the negative impact of this legislation on Korean consumers and app developers”.
Experts believe that Google and Apple can go ahead to cancel out the in-app purchases commission, that they were not the only ones capable of ensuring a payments system free from fraud, and that developers could create their own fraud-proof payments system.
Although the vote to put an end to the 30 percent in-app purchases commission being paid by developers came on Wednesday, a parliamentarian has revealed that the session has been provisionally delayed to the 30th of August.
Ibhadojemu Lucky Emmanuel is a graduate of Education and Economics from the University of Benin. He has a passion for tech and business and has been writing professionally for over a period of five years. He's written across various topics and segments and knew tech-business was it when he first stumbled on it. He has a great passion for music and arts, and wants to visit as many countries as he can someday.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
