Apple is currently under probe by Japan’s Fair Trade Commission. The commission is investigating to know if the phone maker abused its power in violation of anti-monopoly rules and over the pressures it mounted on its Japanese suppliers, as reported by the Mainichi newspaper.
The commission discovered that the tech giant, last year, may have breached antitrust rules on the day it sold its iPhones. Reports showed that Apple signed contracts compelling firms to provide free technology and the procedure to its affiliates for parts manufacturing.
For its own selfish gains, the phone maker also pressured some suppliers to reduce or lower the prices of components and prohibited them from supplying the same components to other companies. Amidst this stringent proposal, it expected the suppliers to shoulder the costs of any unforeseen issues they encounter.
When a company took it up against the phone maker and accused them of infringement of intellectual property rights and demanded a revision of the contract, Apple allegedly threatened to end their business relationship altogether.
Both Apple and Japan Fair Trade Commission have made a press release or a public comment addressing the situation.
Apple has been quite popular with antitrust accusations in the last one year. It’s currently facing a suit in South Korea and Europe over abusing its dominant position as phone maker and imposing ridiculous conditions for selling iPhones. In Europe, Apple obligates the music streaming app to pay a 30% before it can use in-app purchases when signing up new subscribers. Apparently, Spotify wanted to the EU to probe Apple Music in relation to how it treats its competitor’s vs its own business.
A supreme court in May ruled against Apple in antitrust lawsuit allowing consumers to sue anyone who delivers a product for antitrust damages. Apple was accused of monopoly and unfair charges ultimately suffered by consumers.
Last year, Japan FTC investigated Apple over allegations of putting under pressure to slow down the expansion process of its online games’ platform, a competitor of its App store. A potential US investigation is by the corner, with the tech giant facing allegations of its App store policies giving too much power over app sales and in-app purchases.
Certainly, this is not a good moment for the phone maker, just when it’s set to count its loses after the tariff threat.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
