• Cryptocurrency
  • Earnings
  • Enterprise
  • About TechBooky
  • Submit Article
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
TechBooky
  • African
  • AI
  • Metaverse
  • Gadgets
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • African
  • AI
  • Metaverse
  • Gadgets
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
TechBooky
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Home General Government

The Highest Court In Europe Says The UK’s New Surveillance Law Is Illegal

Paul Balo by Paul Balo
December 22, 2016
in Government
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Since the British government announced late last month that it would mandate telecom companies and internet service providers to keep user phone and web records for up to 12 months. This was to allow law enforcements access those records should they choose with the aim of carrying out investigations. As expected, civil liberty organisations have been against the legislation and have since taken the matter to the European court (even though Britain is just about leaving the body) and it looks they scored a major victory yesterday. Europe’s highest court (ECJ) ruled that the UK’s surveillance powers are illegal even the country is about to formally adopt the law and in fact parts of it could begin by the end of this year which is just a couple of days.

Before the European court’s ruling, A British High Court had ruled that the law violated the fundamental human rights of citizens. The government appealed this and that’s how the case got to the European court.

The security services argue that mass surveillance of this scale is necessary in order to keep citizens safe during a time of heightened threats, global terrorist attacks and cyberwarfare. But human rights groups have long said that while some surveillance is necessary, the basic privacy of citizens should not be violated in the process. The court said the “general and indiscriminate retention” of data by the government was indeed illegal  but the court however said “targeted retention” can only be used in cases where there is reason to believe there is an imminent threat. As usual, the British government like their American counterparts would argue that a Judge usually would approve such “secret” processes in the first place and that’s assuming that the public should at least trust that the courts would protect their rights.

While this remains a victory for the human right groups, its likely not to stop the UK government from going forward with most parts of the law including the holding phone records which is due to begin any day now

Liberty’s (a civil liberties group) director Martha Spurrier said in a statement that “Today’s judgment upholds the rights of ordinary British people not to have their personal lives spied on without good reason or an independent warrant…. the government must now make urgent changes to the Investigatory Powers Act to comply with this.”

What’s now left is that the case will now go back to the Britain’s Court of Appeal where judges will rule Vis a Vis UK laws with respect to surveillance.

The government argues that it has to keep the people safe from attacks and as they say, prevention is better than cure. But this keeps the privacy vs. security debate well alive. We’ll see how this plays out in future.

 

Related Posts:

  • mobile_abstract_2020
    The Kenyan Government Consent To Deploy Spyware On…
  • Kenya-CA-Welcomes-Classification-of-Telecommunications-Infrastructure
    The Kenyan Government Will Spy On Communications For…
  • -1x-1 (4)
    Apple Beats German Antitrust Crackdown in High Court
  • X3XTFPQXFBKUVLKAWDUTX6U2SM
    UK and US Seek to Resolve Apple Encryption Dispute
  • Elon Musk Brazil
    How Musk's X Disinformation Row Sheds Light on…
  • J3FQNHAKV5CI5JOBZHWLUWJASI
    EU: X, Facebook, YouTube Toughen Up Over Hate Speech
  • ukkkkkkkkkkkkk
    UK Reviews Social Media Laws Following Far-Right Riots
  • tiktok-gty-er-241227_1735339172032_hpMain_4x3
    Supreme Court Delays TikTok ban on Trump's Request

Discover more from TechBooky

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags: ecjeuropegovernmentlegalspysurveillanceUKunited kingdom
Paul Balo

Paul Balo

Paul Balo is the founder of TechBooky and a highly skilled wireless communications professional with a strong background in cloud computing, offering extensive experience in designing, implementing, and managing wireless communication systems.

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

Select Category

    Receive top tech news directly in your inbox

    subscription from
    Loading

    Freshly Squeezed

    • 22 Nigerian Banks Join PAPSS Cross-Border Payment System May 31, 2025
    • Nintendo’s Hardware Finally Matches Switch Ambitions May 31, 2025
    • Remita Intends To Expand to other African Nations May 31, 2025
    • Vitel Wireless Connects with All Major Nigerian Mobile Networks May 31, 2025
    • Walmart Spent $580M on Microsoft Azure in 11 Months, Leak Shows May 30, 2025
    • Texas Signs Internet Regulations Targeting Apple & Google May 30, 2025

    Browse Archives

    May 2025
    MTWTFSS
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031 
    « Apr    

    Quick Links

    • About TechBooky
    • Advertise Here
    • Contact us
    • Submit Article
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login

    © 2021 Design By Tech Booky Elite

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors
    • African
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Gadgets
    • Metaverse
    • Tips
    • About TechBooky
    • Advertise Here
    • Submit Article
    • Contact us

    © 2021 Design By Tech Booky Elite

    Discover more from TechBooky

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok