The internet has never really been a safe space for most people and with the rise of AI, it has even become worse depending on what side you sit and nonconsensual deepfake porn is the latest of headache for tech companies and regulators alike. Google finds itself at the centre of a storm, grappling with a deluge of takedown requests as thousands of women, including prominent figures from Twitch streamers to gamers, fight back against the spread of these harmful videos online. Deepfake pornography, which is one the challenges of the AI age manipulate or superimpose an individual’s face onto explicit images or videos with the aim of embarrassing these individuals online.
A comprehensive analysis conducted by WIRED has shed light on the alarming surge in copyright complaints surrounding websites hosting deepfake porn, revealing a staggering tally of over 13,000 complaints covering nearly 30,000 URLs directed at some of the most notorious platforms in the deepfake ecosystem.
Leveraging the Digital Media Copyright Act (DMCA), these complaints have been instrumental in the removal of thousands of nonconsensual videos from the web. Yet, despite these efforts, the battle against deepfake porn rages on, with two leading platforms each bearing the brunt of over 6,000 and 4,000 complaints, respectively.
The prevalence of deepfake porn underscores a pressing need for decisive action. Experts argue that Google should take more proactive measures, including the complete removal of offending websites from search results, to stem the tide of this harmful content. Dan Purcell, CEO of Ceartas, stresses the urgency of the situation, emphasizing that platforms solely dedicated to the dissemination of abusive and exploitative content have no place in the digital realm.
As these requests keep coming, Google’s response has been scrutinized. Despite the removal of thousands of infringing links, questions loom over why these platforms continue to linger in search results. Carrie Goldberg, a victims’ rights attorney, highlights the shortcomings of existing legal frameworks in combating deepfakes, underscoring the need for a more robust and victim-centric approach.
As the battle against deepfake porn intensifies, victims face daunting challenges in reclaiming control over their digital identities. Yvette van Bekkum, CEO of Orange Warriors, echoes these sentiments, citing the devastating impact of deepfake content on victims’ lives and the uphill battle they face in seeking redress.
In response to mounting concerns, Google has reiterated its commitment to tackling deepfake porn, leveraging dedicated tools and processes to address copyright infringement and safeguard users’ rights. However, challenges persist, with the DMCA’s limitations proving inadequate in combating the rapidly evolving threat posed by deepfakes.
As the tech industry grapples with the fallout from deepfake porn, calls for greater education and legislative action grow louder. Adam Dodge, founder of Endtab, emphasizes the urgent need for collective action, urging technology companies, legislators, and law enforcement agencies to prioritize the fight against deepfake porn as a critical component of online safety.
As the battle against deepfake porn rages on, one thing remains clear: the fight to protect users’ rights and dignity in the digital age is far from over.
Paul Balo is the founder of TechBooky and a highly skilled wireless communications professional with a strong background in cloud computing, offering extensive experience in designing, implementing, and managing wireless communication systems.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
